|
Authored by: tknarr on Friday, September 28 2012 @ 09:36 PM EDT |
Boies is trying to trick Larry into admitting the e-mail says something it
doesn't. If he can, he can then act later as if the e-mail does say what he
wants it to say because Larry Page admitted on the stand that it does. Larry
didn't fall for it.
The dangers of questioning a geek: we're
ultra-sensitive to technicalities like that, because they're the difference
between correct code and bugs. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mirrorslap on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 02:33 AM EDT |
There was no mistake on Boies' part; it was an intentional attempt to get Mr.
Page to fall into a trap which Mr. Page easily avoided. It was pretty clear to
me
that one basis of Oracle's case was to try to confuse the jury (esp. w.r.t. the
timeline of emails that included Mr. Lindholm) and to try to establish linkages
that simply did not exist, i.e. that Mr. Page had directly told an unknown
underling (Mr. Lindholm) to do some specific work. It was all an elaborate
fiction,
which made it very difficult to record.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 30 2012 @ 06:57 PM EDT |
Or otherwise, if you have deep enough pockets.
And that includes the self-immolation of the client.
Think Oracle and Apple might be vying for most hated in tech?
((Christenson)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|