decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Why *would* they make Win phones? | 281 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Why *would* they make Win phones?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 08:44 AM EDT
All of the major carriers in North America, Europe, and South East Asia have
been burned by Microsoft. One of them so badly, that the only way they will
carry a microsoft phone, is if Microsoft pays for R&D upfront, and also
covers the cost of selling the phones.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The phone business is not the PC business
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 07:00 PM EDT
Microsoft became used to having dictatorial control over PC
OEMs. I suspect all these companies (Dell, HP, Acer, etc.)
detested MS all along, but with such a Windows monopoly,
they had no choice but to accept Microsoft's licensing
terms. I think that is how MS has always kept them from
supporting desktop Linux in any meaningful way.

In the phone business, however, Microsoft just has money,
but no clout to use as a threat against hardware
manufacturers or carriers. When you go into a field where
you are both weak and hated, it isn't surprising when you
don't get very far.

The odd part, though, is that MS did have a significant
chunk of the market in the Blackberrry/Windows Mobile/PalmOS
era. Since the iPhone and Android, however, they have been
completely shut out. Not only is MS down to a small niche,
that niche has continued to collapse even after Win Phone 7
and the Nokia deal came out. There isn't the slightest
suggestion that they are on the verge of a breakthrough. Try
searching for articles from a couple of years ago. They are
full of (paid-for) predictions that Win Phone 7 would grow
steadily and become the market leader around 2014.

Hysterical.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )