decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
There is one decidedly non-satirical point, though | 179 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
There is one decidedly non-satirical point, though
Authored by: mcinsand on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 10:40 AM EDT
MS Windows' inherent insecurity is a national security risk. As we saw with
Stuxnet, even taking Windows boxes offline is inadequate. For any computing
hardware that will handle anything of a sensitive nature, we have to start
requiring some basic design fundamentals. Modular design, such as having the
kernel, desktop manager, and applications as discrete modules is one
requirement. The supplier also cannot intentionally put in back-doors or
phone-home requirements. Eventually, as computing power increases, maybe we can
get to a microkernel architecture to make the path from security hole to system
pwnage more tortuous... much more difficult.

I'm not advocating an outright ban on anything Microsoft or from any other
manufacturer. However, continued use of such a flawed product as today's
Windows makes reliability and security impossible. If our national security
matters, though, then we need to start a review of our software design
requirements, and only products that meet those requirements can be
legally-permitted.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )