decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Secure wipe - That's not the partition table | 179 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Secure wipe - That's not the partition table
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 21 2012 @ 01:53 PM EDT
for securely wiping a disk, see DBAN

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Reasons besides secure wipe
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 21 2012 @ 05:43 PM EDT
I posted GP.

I understand wiping the disk to get rid of sensitive data, although I am partial
to shred(1) (for entire partitions or the entire disk, which avoids the issues
the man page points out for "modern filesystems"). As far as the
other issues you raise ... I believe I have read about Microsoft products
sometimes doing weird things on installation when out-of-date information is on
the disk but I don't remember hearing about any such issues when using reputable
software -- at least if you avoid all versions of the FAT filesystem. (Even
with FAT I think the issues only arise with MS softare but it has been a while
since I have looked at it.) TMK, any Linux distro will install and run just
fine no matter what garbarge was already on the disk at installation time. The
only issue being it might query you whether you wish to make a dual boot or
simply overwrite an OS which is already present.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )