decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
1973Ex15 | 179 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
1973Ex15
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 11:03 PM EDT
I know that the courts didn't hold Rambus to that standard.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Wol on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 08:42 AM EDT
1973Ex15
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 11:21 PM EDT

The industry has learned from the RAMbus debacle.


The basic rule these days is that, you you participate in a standards-setting body, you must disclose any IP during the process of working on the standard. Your participation comes with an agreement to freely contribute anything you don't disclose.


If you want to retain your full rights, i.e. no agreement for (F)RAND, then your only option is to not participate in the standard-setting group.


I don't think Apple is doing anything strange or unusual here. Have a look at the frontmatter in any of the recent IETF RFCs if you want to see how the industry has tightened up generally on these IP shenanigans.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Wol on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 08:40 AM EDT
    • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Tkilgore on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 04:48 PM EDT
      • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 05:11 PM EDT
        • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Tkilgore on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 08:27 PM EDT
          • 1973Ex15 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 10:21 PM EDT
Qualcomm or Broadcomm
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 20 2012 @ 04:28 PM EDT
Sorry I get those two confused, but one of them also fell into the
same trap within the life of Groklaw. So haven't the Standards
people worked out how to avoid this?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )