decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field | 173 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 18 2012 @ 11:30 PM EDT
Yup! Way to convenient.

My local library had an internet f_rt last year. For
well over a month, no one could directly access Google though Bing was suggested
as an alternative (the only browser on the network is Internet Explorer). They
even posted "We're Sorry, Perhaps you could use ____ instead" signs at the
terminals. After complaining several times to no avail, I finally raised a
royal stink to the chief librarian and made a real asset out of myself. The fact
was I couldn't stand being told that they were pouring enormous resources into
solving the problem and couldn't figure out how in the world to fix it.
Outside, someone else who overheard my conversation told me they too were not
pleased with the supposed unsolvable problem. I went to my local representative
and the police as well, given that my freedoms were being infringed in an
inexcusable manner. The problem was solved within several days.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 04:07 AM EDT
We had a contractor set it up = Don't blame me

We had a contractor set it up but we forgot to tell him how = Go wash
your mouth out.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 04:29 AM EDT
Since when do contractors do anything they aren't explicitly told to do?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field
Authored by: odysseus on Wednesday, September 19 2012 @ 09:04 AM EDT
Since when has a client ever specified the requirements in sufficient detail for
the contractor to deliver what the client really wants?

Yes, I'm a contractor, and sadly most of my clients are idiots who don't know
what they want, hence why they call in a contractor. What they don't know I
fill in, that's my job.

If you look at the list of what's blocked and what's not clocked it is very
inconsistent between 'good' and 'bad' sites, it allows sites that would be
blocked if this was a conspiracy.

No, my guess is the contractor was called in, told to install a public wifi
network and that it was a federal requirement to have filtering in place,
installed whatever software they favour and just used some standard list from
the vendor. Believe me, most organisations don't want to waste their time and
effort configuring or maintaining this stuff, they just use whatever some vendor
supplies.

John.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )