|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 09:07 PM EDT |
Nt (Christenson)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: nsomos on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 09:50 PM EDT |
Supposedly ...
Hogan told us Tuesday that he didn't mention the
1993 Seagate case
or bankruptcy in the jury selection process because he wasn't
asked
specifically to disclose every case he'd ever been involved in.
According
to a complete transcript of voir dire, Koh asked jurors,
"Have you or a family
member or someone very close to you ever been
involved in a lawsuit, either as a
plaintiff, a defendant or as a witness?"
If true, then Hogan lied
during the voir dire.
This alone should, in my opinion, be enough to be
misconduct.
If nothing else, it should prove that Hogan failed to follow
directions.
One might well wonder what other directions he failed to
follow.
We do know that there were errors in how the jury form was
originally
filled out, before the jury was sent back to correct those
errors.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|