Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

The F in FRAND is not for "Free" | 190 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

The Microsoft Standards-Essential Patents Shell Game -- Motorola Tells Its Story to the 9th Circuit Ct. of Appeals ~pj

Authored by: PJ on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 12:37 PM EDT

But the EU Commission, regarding the Google
purchase, IIRC, stated that so far in the EU,
injunctions are possible.

And the court in Germany has granted an
injunction. Duh.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ignore the troll (n/t)

Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT

---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ignore the troll (n/t) - Authored by: BJ on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 03:54 PM EDT
- Ignore the troll (n/t) - Authored by: Zox on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 07:40 PM EDT

Yes, but at what point of "not gonna pay, ever!" do you raise the stakes? (Thus, injnction)(n/t)

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 11:42 PM EDT

n/t

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The F in FRAND is not for "Free"

Authored by: symbolset on Tuesday, September 18 2012 @ 12:22 AM EDT

The F in FRAND is for "Fair". If you license your inventions under FRAND terms,
that doesn't mean you've contributed them to the public domain. It only means
that you've agreed to accept "Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory" terms for
licensees who agree to license your invention.

If you try to use the invention
for free forever, expect to be called on it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )