decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
And where does ethics, and the rights of opressed minorities fit in? | 190 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And where does ethics, and the rights of opressed minorities fit in?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 18 2012 @ 07:40 AM EDT
And where does ethics, and the rights of opressed minorities fit in?

That is, Scalie seems to support Jim Crow, obsolete laws banning various
practices in the bedroom, and who knows what else. Where is the law "as
practiced by society?", unintended consequences, and then-unknown
technology (the net!) etc.

He should read the legislative history behind anti-abortion laws, which has more
to do with the AMA wanting a monopoly over midwives than it does over any moral
outrage at the process.

Similar for the laws banning Marijuana. The AMA didn't even support that....it
was so the government could arrest any uppity mexicans who threatened the farm
labor system with things like a right to be paid for work done.

(Christenson)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )