decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
A salutory lesson coming? | 197 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
So, TwinPeaks are essentially dead then.
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 08:48 AM EDT
"Pay RedHat a wheelbarrow full of cash,"
Lets make it a few semi's full of pennies, shall we? Just for the inconvinience
factor.

I figure the FSF will wait for RedHat to get through discovery to confirm what's
actually there, then pounce. Though they might be rounding up a few authors who
don't assign copyright, to add extra lawsuits to the TwinPeaks workload.

I get the feeling that this could turn into the antiSCO pretty quickly.

This is the first time I know of that a GPL company has really had the teeth to
fight back cleanly, so I think I'm quite morally comfortable getting myself some
popcorn and putting on Frankie Goes to Hollywood's Two Tribes for the soundtrack
:)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

RedHat pretty much has to finish them
Authored by: matth on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 10:21 AM EDT

The way I see it, RH has stance to maintain in the market. They estimated RH as a soft target, and attempted to prey on them. Should that be rewarded with leniency of any sort?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A salutory lesson coming?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 12:37 PM EDT
Along the lines of don't carry a hornets' nest into the tiger pit?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Twin Peaks is in SUCH a world of hurt
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 10:41 AM EDT
Would it not be reasonably that the FOSS community, that itself
does not participate in the patent game, and that offers
everybody that amount of code and idea's essentially for free,
could have this way to defend itself.

Thinking of a standard reply for any party accused of patent
infringement in open source product to have the assurance that
the accusing party's is checked for FOSS copyrights infringement
during discovery?

Would it not be far to unjust that some high profile company
could collect a lot of money for some dubious patent on some
movement of some body part, while in the same time using FOSS
code without playing by the rules. Just speaking theoretically

If anybody is thinking about patent reform, this could be part of
it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )