|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 13 2012 @ 11:28 AM EDT |
This is a good example of why many litigators, especially
defense lawyers, subscribe to a fight-over-every-little-
detail philosophy. Every once in a while your opponent gets
distracted, rushed, and sleep-deprived enough that they
completely forget to do something rather important.
Not that apple really cares about punitive damages. They
were lucky to get a favorable verdict, and they know it.
They also know this case will be appealed, and it will be
years before they get a dime from the judgement, if ever.
Still, having the judge triple the damages would have been
quite nice from a PR standpoint - and it should have been
almost automatic given that the jury found in Apple's favor
on almost all questions of fact.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 13 2012 @ 11:29 AM EDT |
As if this isn't bad enough we will really see the uglyness later on. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Hindsight - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 13 2012 @ 01:05 PM EDT
|
|
|
|