decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Is it Google to blame? | 142 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is it Google to blame?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 12 2012 @ 08:33 PM EDT

As I understand, the stock version of Android Google provides the phone manufacturers comes with a lot of freedom - and not a lot of the apps that will show up on a manufacturer's phone.

The companies then proceed to modify what they want - it is controlled by the Apache license after all. They lock down the device for their choice of phone apps and install their own - like the Samsung Apps selection.

They then hand that off to a distributor - such as AT&T - who then proceeds to lock the phone into their specific network... at the least.

Given Motorola (now owned by Google) has recently made it available to start unlocking devices, are you really sure Google is the guilty party locking down phones? Are you really sure Android - Google's Android, not the Manufacturer's Android - is to blame?

Granted... Motorola used to be in that other group and now they've joined up with Google. There's lots of work to be done with regards unlocking and providing base systems that the owner truly can fully choose which apps are to be installed. Lots of work that won't be completed overnight.

Perhaps we should give Google and Motorola a chance to produce the kind of product at least some of us in the marketplace desire before we blame them for the locking that's being done by other parties.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )