|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 08:00 PM EDT |
The "excellent explanation" link is bogus. It should point to <a
href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/10/apple-v-samsung-jury-verdict-lac
ks-sufficient-detail-to-support-enhanced-damages/id=27921/">this
page</a>[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: nsomos on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 08:05 PM EDT |
| [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: zman58 on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 08:24 PM EDT |
PJ,
The link you provided above does not take me to the article by Richard
T. Redano. It instead takes me to a rather over-the-top pro-patent article by
Gene Quinn, who laments on how great patents are, helping innovation, progress,
etc.. blah blah all of the usual ramblings. I cannot imagine you wanted to link
to that one.
The Redano article you referred to looks like it can be found
here:
redano
article
I hope that helps :)
---
I FLOSS at least
once every day and smile quite often. It helps keep my system healthy. Smile! :D [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 08:37 PM EDT |
| The link to the IPWatchdog dog is wrong, it can be read here.
Source:
<
i>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2012/09/10/apple-v-
samsung-jury-verdict-lacks-suffi
cient-detail-to-support-
enhanced-damages/id=27921/ [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
