Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 09:09 AM EDT |
I believe that when the judge made the ruling
“The Court will
entertain only one post-judgment motion for
relief per side, not including
Apple’s motion for permanent injunction and
willfulness enhancement.”
that each side was to include all of their post-judgement
requests in that one
motion.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 09:25 AM EDT |
Would be interesting if the judge ruled that this WAS Apples filing, and they
are not allowed a second one!
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Oh!!!! - Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 10:51 AM EDT
|
Authored by: DannyB on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 11:11 AM EDT |
The judge may want to prevent a never ending series of ongoing motions. Put all
your issues into a single motion. Now.
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|