Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Apple and Samsung Argue About Apple's "Non-Jury Issues" ~pj | 113 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Apple and Samsung Argue About Apple's "Non-Jury Issues" ~pj

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 11:49 PM EDT

ok, then Apple will receive the money when mil coins are produced? Sounds
reasonable?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

may not have minted a coin

Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 08:09 AM EDT

But most places tax property based on millage. In fact, I don't know of any that
don't.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple and Samsung Argue About Apple's "Non-Jury Issues" ~pj

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 11 2012 @ 09:32 AM EDT

Not true.

You must have never have heard of tokens.

As a kid in the 1950s I had numerous ones issued in the 1930. Issued by whom is
questionable as the US did not issue much money before 1914 (WW1) and was still
not the primary source until 1933 (reissuing after the call in of gold). All
money before 1914 and a majority after WW1 was issued by either states or local
banks. There was no interstate banking and in many states banks were limited to
one office. Money was nor fungible or uniforn as it is today.

Anyway 1 token equaled 0.1 cent or 0.001 dollar.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )