decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Definition of detailed analysis | 158 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Might well have been a serious effort
Authored by: stegu on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 05:30 PM EDT
> I'm not entirely convinced that Oracle were serious about
> coming out with their own smart phone OS. It's pretty far
> from their core business.

A lot of the existing people and projects they took over
from Sun were quite alien to Oracle's core business, and
it is not entirely improbable that they did try to keep
some of the existing momentum to make some money.
Many of those people have since been laid off or
left the company by their own accord, and many of
the former Sun Java projects have been canceled or
scaled back. Even Java itself seems to be neglected.
The recent security problems, the time it took to
fix them and the new problems the fixes introduced
speak of a Java project put on the back burner, with
Oracle making only minimal efforts to keep it alive.

Bundling the Ask Toolbar as a "suggested feature"
in the recent JRE install packages speaks of a Java
project in disarray, selling out for petty cash
instead of continuing Sun's mission to provide the
world with a relevant and "free" programming language.
Of course, Sun went down over it, so of course
Oracle will try anything to make desktop Java more
profitable, but the Ask Toolbar? I mean, really?
How much money can there be in that, and how
much annoyance does it create for their users
to have Ask set as the default search provider if
you forget to uncheck a box during a JRE install?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Definition of detailed analysis
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 05:51 PM EDT
Copy the best bits :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )