decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Closing the software patent loophole: Professor Lemley's new proposal | 158 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Closing the software patent loophole: Professor Lemley's new proposal
Authored by: stegu on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 02:50 PM EDT
I am not familiar with the underlying meanings of English
idioms, but this old saying has an equivalent in Swedish,
and I have always assumed that its message was a lot more
arrogant than "don't just sit there, do something".
The weather is not something you can "do anything about",
which makes the phrase more of an advice to stop whining
about things you can't control, and come to terms with it.
This is actually terribly bad advice in this situation,
because patent law is very obviously made my people
and can be changed by people.

However, reading the article, which I hope you have done,
it becomes apparent that what the author means is that
you *can* do something about it, and he is pointing to
the options. I think the solution he proposes is a very
elegant one, and one that has clear and convincing
precedent with a history of success for a similar
patent overreach problem in the 1950's. If only the
patent industry could be swayed to support it, it
could at least make a big difference for the better.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Agreed - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 03:49 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )