|
Authored by: matth on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 12:54 AM EDT |
I promise, not all coders are as attentive to detail as the this judge. He's
top
notch. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 07:14 AM EDT |
I mean, also have a look at his time management of OraGoogle...and he was also
doing a criminal docket in the afternoons!
(Christenson, impressed, hoping Judge Alsup can lend Judge Koh a hand as Hogan
has put her in such a sticky wicket)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 11:21 AM EDT |
Here is one example.
"MR. JACOBS: It's a tiny thing, your Honor, but it's -- well, it's worth
raising. You had asked for a binder of key documents. We each gave you 10.
THE COURT: That's great. That's all I need.
MR. JACOBS: Okay.
THE COURT: If I need more, I will ask for it, but 10 is -- you know, I've
learned the hard way. Joe Alioto used to try a case. He only needed two
documents. One was the worst document in the file of the other side and the
other was the Magna Carta. And he never lost a case.
You know, I need more than that. I need 20 documents in a case like this. But if
I need more than that, I'm going
to see what they are and you will give them to me and I will ask for them. I
have so little space up here, I can't deal with about more than 20 documents. So
that's fine.
MR. JACOBS: Thank you, your Honor."
This is in contrast to Judge Koh who says something like No more submissions.
You have given me enough to chew on. Can't find the exact quote but I believe it
is close.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|