Authored by: cricketjeff on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 10:22 AM EDT |
That's why they wanted the two lawyers jointly and severally responsible for the
costs
---
There is nothing in life that doesn't look better after a good cup of tea.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 10:25 AM EDT |
And the lawyers are listed there too so between the 3 of them they might
actually be able to pay it rather than all 3 declare bankruptcy.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 21 2012 @ 06:45 PM EDT |
Heh... The problem lies in that you can't bundle judgements under seal in a
Bankruptcy. This is that...meaning that he'd best hope for being basically
Judgement Proof (You can be determined to be that if you're in a
Bankruptcy...but you can't erase THAT particular debt...) for the duration of
the Statute of Limitations on this gem.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|