decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Microsoft's China cloud move: legal? | 43 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nokia confirms ‘poor judgment;’ shares jump
Authored by: PolR on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 12:53 PM EDT
PJ asks:
Why would shares go up 6% after an admission of poor judgment?
I think the two are unrelated. I sounds like a short squeeze to me. Nokia stocks has been moving down wildly in the past months (years?). There must have been a lot of short positions. But the stock market as a whole is moving up sharply this morning. This kind of conditions are prone to trigger short squeezes.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft's China cloud move: legal?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 01:03 PM EDT

Just stumbled across this:
Microsoft Azure's China Cloud Raises Troubling Questions

Anyone have any thoughts on this? How will Microsoft avoid the tricky situation of complying with China's Internet policies?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Tricky? What's tricky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 01:16 PM EDT
    • Err..? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 02:03 PM EDT
Microsoft v. Motorola?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 14 2012 @ 02:34 PM EDT
"Microsoft v. Motorola, 12-35352, featured two of the country's leading appellate advocates arguing

Remember when technology was about making products and SELLING them ... link

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )