2) the thread made clear that it isn't
an
error.
Which thread made it clear? I noticed that someone
suggested the same "fix" again (or was that comment just copied-over piecemeal?)
in this Corrections thread, which necessitated another (new) comment explaining
why the pluperfect might be desirable. The "see above" follow-up comment was
confusing to me, because I didn't see any further explanation from PJ or others
on the page. Of course, that just might be a side effect of the Threaded view I
was using to read the site (see below (no, really! :) re: different content in
different views).
What I have noticed in the past is that often an
empty Anonymous canonical
thread will be made to go away after the
proper canonical thread is posted;
Hmm... so it appears that the
old thread is gone from the Threaded and Nested views, however from the Flat
view the missing comments are visible. I wonder if that's an intentional design
in GeekLog or if it's just an implementation quirk.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|