decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not to mention following the Law | 149 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not to mention following the Law
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 11:55 AM EDT

And as I understand, the Law is laid out in front of them in the Jury Instructions.

Exhibit A: Final Jury Instruction No. 35 - Utility Patent Damages -- Burden Of Proof

I will instruct you about the measure of damages for claims of utility patent infringement. By instructing you on damages, I am not suggesting which party should win on any issue. If you find that either party infringed any valid and enforceable claim of the other side's patents, you must then determine the amount of money damages to be awarded to the patent holder to compensate it for the infringement.

The amount of those damages must be adequate to compensate the patent holder for the infringement. A damages award should put the patent holder in approximately the financial position it would have been in had the infringement not occurred, but in no even may the damages award be less than a reasonable royalty. You should keep in mind that the damages you award are meant to compensate the patent holder and not to punish an infringer.

Each patent holder has the burden to persuade you of the amount of its damages. You should award only those damages that the patent holder proves it suffered by a preponderance of the evidence. While a patent holder is not required to prove its damages with mathematical precision, it must prove them with reasonable certainty. Neither patent holder is entitled to damages that are remote or speculative.
From the horse's mouth:
However, Hogan said that was a misinterpretation of his description: "I realise how it sounds, but it wasn't 'punish'. In this country, intellectual property deserves to be protected. My real point was that if any company decides to ignore the stipulations and rules and gets too close that they cross the line and infringes and does so willfully – they need to understand if they take the risk and get caught, they should have to pay for it."
Sorry Mr. Hogan: try and rationalize all you want. You've made it clear the Jury found damages such that were above compensation. Whether you wanted to target Samsung specifically or send a message to others doesn't really matter.

Bottom line: You choose to ignore the Jury Instructions and take the Law into your own hands.

My humble opinion.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )