decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It's still Microsoft though | 149 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
It's still Microsoft though
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 01:44 PM EDT

If they are as concerned as you say over the EU's bigger bite - why did they wait so long after being informed of the issue before they started moving on it? Why did they only move on it when the Commission - rather then consumers - pointed out the problem?

The apparent facts:

    The original promise for the choice, rolled out in Feb 2010, was that the choice was to be in place till 2014.
    The patch that was applied that ended up removing the browser choice was rolled out in Feb 2011. Merely one year after the initial rollout.
    Some who noticed informed Microsoft of that.
    Dec 2011 Microsoft represented to the EU Commission that the choice was still available knowing - or should have known - that customers have raised the issue.
    July 2012 the EU Commission started acting on complaints about the choice.
    Microsoft then - apparently - noticed the problem and promised to get right on top of it:
      15 months after the problem first appeared
      at least 7 months after Microsoft had informed the EU Commission that it was still available.
I don't for a moment believe - given the time frames involved - that this was an innocent technical error. As a result, I humbly conclude this is just Microsoft testing the waters. Seeing how much the EU Commission is paying attention and to what in order to see what they can get away with.

Like an unruly child who has only received a very mild reprimand for trying to get funny with the rules and will try again, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest Microsoft will try again.

EU or not - Microsoft appears to have gotten away with their behavior in relation to the "OOXML Industry Specification". There are behaviors that some of us find dis-tasteful that Microsoft can still get away with and Microsoft knows it.

Additionally, some interesting questions to be asked:

    How many computers went out without the choice in the meantime?
    How many of those will have the choice pop up for them the first time they log in after the new patch is applied?
    Will Microsoft receive some type of punishment (such as a massive fine) from the EU Commission for this failure?
My fortune telling guess: If Microsoft is not fined, expect a new patch about a year from now that removes the choice again.

To keep Microsoft playing nicely: You have to constantly watch them and not look away.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )