decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Good question... | 149 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Good question...
Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 10:43 AM EDT
I have considered that. Then we see him going on putting his foot ever
deeper into his mouth. Evidence that Apple has kept it's distance from
him. Contrary evidence would be him issuing retractions and then
saying all the "right" things.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They are not that clueless
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 11:21 AM EDT
Apple are smart enough to stay well clear of any interference with the jury
foreman.
He tried to help out the side he felt connected to. His bad.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't think they're allowed to
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 12:05 PM EDT

IANAL, but I recall reading a news incident that touched on that point.

The situation was:

    A Jury Member went to a local bar shortly after the verdict and initiated conversation with a Lawyer (the Juror didn't know the listener was a Lawyer).
    The Lawyer was not a member of any party to the trial.
    The Juror mentioned something along the lines "the defendant didn't have a chance with me on the Jury" - basically the Juror indicated going into the trial with a preset bias.
    The Lawyer brought the situation to the attention of the Judge of the case.
    The Judge found for a mistrial I think.
Anyway the situation gave me the impression it's a very strong no-no for either sides Lawyers to be speaking with any Jury members.

If I have all that correct:

I imagine Apple's Lawyers were wishing they could get him to shut up knowing if they said anything to him it'd likely increase the odds of a mistrial occurring.

Wish I could pull up that incident so I can provide a link... but my Google searching on this particular item appears to be getting nothing but white noise.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Whaddya mean 20/20? Hindsight is 20/10!...
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 06:55 PM EDT
And, there are plenty of ways Velvin Hogan could figure out he is not helping
his cause...he can read all the Groklaw he wants, now that the trial is over!

I think Hogan is too busy being famous to listen...and the people around him are
too busy exploiting that to let him know about the damage he is doing to his
verdict....remember, he's not surrounded by Apple Fanbois, he's surrounded by
media hacks, and blood in the water is their lifeblood!

Poor Apple attorneys...they must be cringeing every time he opens his mouth in
public...wonder if Apple and Samsung will STIPULATE a mis-trial, since Hogan is
a one-man destroy Apple's reputation campaign? (Think Jar-Jar Binks of one of
the stupider Star Wars Movies...I didn't know he was real!)

(Christenson)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )