Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 05:14 PM EDT |
It is still a crime whether you intend it to be or not.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 06:16 PM EDT |
Most places, that's manslaughter... and I would think jury tampering wouldn't
require much of a mens rea either. Just contempt of court...on Hogan's part.
There's *GOT* to be a mistrial on the way....Judge Koh, please call Judge Alsup,
ask for help!!!
(Christenson)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 10 2012 @ 01:59 AM EDT |
He has no intent of doing wrong, and quite accidently runs a red light and kills
someone in the cross walk.
But he argues in court that he didn't have any criminal intent kill anyone.
Based on this argument he is found not-guilty of the criminal charge of
involuntary manslaugher.
Is this what you would like us to swallow?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|