decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Confusing Verdict Form Might have caused Error | 149 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
+1
Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 09:10 AM EDT

The trial, and the verdict form could have been arranged to test the validity of the patents as the FIRST phase.

You make an excellent point that should be adopted broadly - especially in this era of so many questionable patents. Your simple suggestion for a better approach could make a huge difference in itself, even if all other things remain as they are. Congratulations on your innovative thinking.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • +1 - Authored by: luvr on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 05:57 PM EDT
Judges have conferences don't they?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 09:31 AM EDT
I'm not sure what topics are discussed but this one looks like an obvious
candidate. Alsup got it right, imo. Others might struggle to do so.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Confusing Verdict Form Might have caused Error
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 09 2012 @ 03:01 PM EDT
I thought that prior art tests were at the beginning which is
why the jury got stumped on them until Hogan had his 'aha!'
moment?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )