Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Karma | 209 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Karma

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 01:14 AM EDT

Apple went after Samsung and won a rigged contest in court (Well, at least 1st.
round ).
Then, to show their unworthy opponents the might of their wrath, Apple decides
to stop funding Samsung's business by not buying their displays there no more.
Begone spot!
Now Apple is spinning the low supply situation they find themselves in into a
high demand tale.
Oh irony if Apple must come, hat in hand, to beg Samsung for a couple of hundred
thousand displays to tie them over.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Karma - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 04:41 AM EDT
- 2nd place at market lost because it is not number 1 - Authored by: marcosdumay on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 10:44 AM EDT
  - Good. Rest In Pieces. (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT
  - 2nd place at market lost because it is not number 1 - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 06:55 PM EDT
    - 2nd place at market lost because it is not number 1 - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 12:56 AM EDT
      - Don't forget ZaReason, ThinkPenguin, Emperor Linux, Eight Virtues, and Los Alamos Computers! - Authored by: sgtrock on Monday, September 17 2012 @ 10:12 AM EDT

Maybe Apple will buy Sharp?

Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 02:40 PM EDT

On the other hand, if they are having problems with the technology of making displays a buy out won't help - at least in the short term that Apple requires.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )