decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Hmmmmm | 209 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Hmmmmm
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 02:59 AM EDT
I'm thinking back to when MS made a loud complaining noise about the
piracy of Windows OS and Office in China. The visible official response
at the time was a waving of Red Flag Linux, the implication being that
whatever happened MS wouldn't get traditional business from China.
Fast forward, now Red Flag has faded away to almost invisible and
everybody else uses a zero or low cost chinese version of Windows XP.
What happened? Were MS paid off? Did they just decide it was a lost cause?
I'm not suggesting Google should do the same, the two company's
business ethics are so different we should expect a different result.

Google's official response thus far is about compatibility, they don't
want a fork of Android that won't cleanly run the Google apps suite.
But many of Google's apps are blocked from essential server access
from within China. So the fork has happened outside of Android.
Acer's dilemma now is, do they need that Chinese Aliyun market
so much they can afford to drop out of the OHA, call their non-Aliyun
devices something not Android and alienate their non-Chinese customers.

Oh, and now they've been tipped off they'd be wise not to pre-load
any stolen apps. And the rest of us should just settle back and not
waste our breath moaning about the pirate app stores in China.
I don't see much we can do about that.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Hmmmmm - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 11:43 AM EDT
    • Hmmmmm - Authored by: symbolset on Sunday, September 16 2012 @ 04:37 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )