Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

We Have the Oracle v. Google Trial Transcripts! Here's Day 1, April 16, 2012 ~pj Updated, as text | 40 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

We Have the Oracle v. Google Trial Transcripts! Here's Day 1, April 16, 2012 ~pj Updated, as text

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 07 2012 @ 11:12 AM EDT

It will be interesting to see how the jury foreman made it onto the jury given
his experience as a patent holder, which would seem to rule him out as a
potential juror.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Alsup hit the nail right on the head! - Authored by: yorkshireman on Friday, September 07 2012 @ 11:46 AM EDT

Of particular interest

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 07 2012 @ 05:48 PM EDT

"THE COURT: All right. Well, I'm going to leave it there and
let the -- the lawyers may come back and ask you some more
questions.

I need to say to the rest of you. You've heard some
opinions here by this particular juror. That's not evidence
in the case. And the fact that he has some opinions about
software patents, well, good for him. This is still America
and you can have all the opinions you want.

But you've got to decide this case based on the evidence
here in the courtroom, and you can form your own opinions
after all the evidence is in. That's what your duty would
be. But you should not be taking what one juror said as
evidence in the case."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )