|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 03:03 PM EDT |
| Here
you go [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 03:15 PM EDT |
Please summarize in the Title box error->correction or s/error/correction/ to
make it easy to scan see what needs to be corrected and to avoid duplication of
effort.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 03:19 PM EDT |
Please stay off topic in these threads. Use HTML Formatted mode to make your
links nice and clickable.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 03:21 PM EDT |
Please type the title of the News Picks article in the Title box of your
comment, and include the link to the article in HTML Formatted mode for the
convenience of the readers after the article has scrolled off the News Picks
sidebar.
Hint: Avoid a Geeklog bug that posts some links broken by putting a space on
either side of the text of the link, as in
<a href="http://example.com/foo"> See the spaces? </a>
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: artp on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:20 PM EDT |
For those good souls whoa re still working on transcribing
the documents from the Comes v. MS trial. See "Comes v. MS"
link above.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:22 PM EDT |
| Audio would be very good. It conveys the temperature, mood, rhythm and
atmosphere in the courtroom that text cannot.
I guess one has to pay for
that, right? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: bugstomper on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 08:26 PM EDT |
PJ, check your email for the file.
The script doesn't fully understand the table of appearances at the start or the
index at the end, but the other 219 pages should be all set.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 09:25 PM EDT |
"THE COURT: No hands go up.
Next one is patent and copyright law. Just say, patents and copyrights. Anybody
got any specialized training or experience in patents or copyrights? If so,
raise your hand.
(No response.)
THE COURT: No hands go up. Okay."
(reference page 109)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 09:57 PM EDT |
Has anybody considered publishing the transcripts using software such as that
used by OpenAustralia (based on
TheyWorkForYou) to publish
Australian government Hansard?
If you look at the way they show debates
(example
Dorothy Dixer
"debate"), it is nice to be able to easily comment on certain
parts of the discussion, search for remarks from certain speakers, link to wiki
articles for jargon, etc.
At some point, I may have a play with seeing
if it fits well with the groklaw archives.
Keep up the good work! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: NilsR on Friday, September 07 2012 @ 04:26 AM EDT |
This was outstanding work by the judge. I'm looking forward to comparing this
with the jury selection in the Apple vs Samsung case.
---
NilsR
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 07 2012 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
|
So you be very careful on how you proceed with that, because I am suspicious
of your motives.
MR. JACOBS: Understood, your Honor. We will give you know
cause for further suspicion.
Clearly, what Mr. Jacobs said was "We will
give you no cause for further suspicion." but at first I read it as: "We
will give, you know, cause for further suspicion."
(I mentally
inserted punctuation to make sense, rather than replacing "know" with its
homonym "no" to make sense.)
John Macdonald
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
