decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
NP: "First Lady's convention speech removed from YouTube" - more ... | 228 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
NP: "First Lady's convention speech removed from YouTube" - more ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 03:31 AM EDT
Those still happen in many countries around the world today.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

NP: "First Lady's convention speech removed from YouTube" - more ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:20 AM EDT
It's in the public interest that fair use is upheld.

Only letting the stuff that big media wants you to see through the filters isn't
going to help anything.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Content Owners Need Easier, Faster Granting of License Exceptions!
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 12:42 PM EDT
This could have all been avoided if the team handling Michelle
Obama's Speech would have either preferably sought different
music or personally sought permission from the content owners
directly behind viacom's back, prior to airing. But no
doubt... the EVIL of Viacom Strikes again as they also
disabled their content streams from Direct TV as well for
failing to come to a license agreement. Only after the
networks had at least gotten through the Convention at
Midnight.

YouTube had no choice but broadcast that message, then later
declare it a mistake prevent Viacom from again coming after
them and possibly the Democratic Convention. It's a sure sign
Viacom is a hardcore supporter of Romney and the Republican
Party. Due in part for their support of SOPA. As opposed to
Obama being ready to veto it!

So why didn't Michelle's handlers pick different music, not
owned by Viacom? Maybe at least sought permission prior to
airing. For that I'd say fire 'em.... they should've known
better. There is no more evil content owner on the planet than
Viacom and they have proved that time after time by issuing
many false takedowns on YouTube as well. When they didn't even
own the content in the first place. Companies like this should
be barred from abusing the DMCA so often.

Or.... Viacom needs to quit being so dragonian in asserting
their asinine claims in the first place. Google can't take any
chances with these nitwitted thugs in control this company.

The only thing that saved it was YouTube popping the screen up
that "This Video is Private". So that Viacom couldn't do
something against the President's Channel and Home Page. Which
no doubt.... Viacom would do in a heartbeat!

Viacom should just be DMCA'd off the face of the earth... I
say!!!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )