decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Understanding Hogan. | 307 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 09:10 PM EDT
True. If his motives were malicious, it would recommend against his openness in
discussing the deliberations.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 10:27 PM EDT
"Understanding Hogan" would be a good name for a stoner movie.

The part I don't get is how he continues to get a pass in the interviews. Isn't

there one reporter out there who would enjoy backing him into a corner and
flushing him down the toilet? Just one?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Charles888 on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 12:58 AM EDT
Agreed. Nothing worse than an
idiot, than an idiot who think he is
smart.
Add to that a pinch of self-
assuredness and a lot of weak willed
jury, and you have a mess on you
have a mess on our hands.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 02:54 AM EDT
Any sufficiently shocking display of stupidity is
indistinguishable from malice

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 12:21 PM EDT
There's a paper on this that I found (or rather was pointed to) on the
internet.

Somthing like, "dumb, and too dumb to recognise it".

The general conclusion was that the majority of people assume they are average,
the idiots because they can't see their own weaknesses, and the clever ones
because they can't believe how stupid other people can be.

What was interesting was, if you took the dumb ones and gave them the tools to
see their dumbness, they suddenly improved both in their ability AND in their
ability to assess their ability.

Maybe that question was a trick question - if someone said "of course I'm a
great programmer" they didn't get the job?

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

might be Dunning-Kruger effect
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 12:27 PM EDT
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes.


To put it plainly, individuals with less competence in a certain area are often not well equipped to judge their own competence in that area. This is how people who are actually quite bad at a certain competency can end up thinking they are good at it--they aren't equipped to even notice that they're bad at it.

It's possible that Mr. Hogan thinks he understands all about patents and patent law because of his personal experience in applying for, and being granted, a patent. He many not even be aware that some of the reasoning he applied to steer the jury's findings was completely contrary to law and to the jury instructions. Since he keeps giving interviews, I think its safe to assume he doesn't read Groklaw.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The wise man parable.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 02:13 PM EDT
There once was an inquisitive lad who wondered why an old man was called the
village wise man. So, he decided to ask the question... Are you wise? The old
man thought for a minute and responded this way. Truely, I could not be wise if
I said I was. But to say I wasn't would be a lie. I think the moral for me is
beware of those who have a certainty about them that excludes evaluation of
fresh data. It is not crime to be wrong but it does take a certain amount of
humility to admit it. I don't know if he can do it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Understanding Hogan.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 01:28 PM EDT
This is precisely why I ask canidates to rank themselves for specific
technologies on a scale of 1 to 10 when interviewing (and then to explain the
rating they've chosen). The ones who have a clue give themselves between 5 and
7. The canidates that don't even know what it is, mostly choose a 9 or 10. It
tells me more about the canidates mindset in about 3 seconds than the entire
rest of the interview.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )