|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 05:29 PM EDT |
I think that question is in response to Hogan's statement
about how he can read
source code and explained to the
other jurors that they weren't
interchangeable. From the
BBC interview:
And so consequently,
when we looked at the
source code - I was able to read source code - I showed
the
jurors that the two methods in software were not the same,
nor could they
be interchangeable because the hardware that
was involved between the old
processor and the new
processor - you couldn't load the new software
methodology
in the old system and expect that it was going to work, and
the
converse of that was true.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 05:37 PM EDT |
Firewheels's question did not interpret patent law, it submitted two alternative
scenarios (the patent being on the implementation versus the patent not being on
the implementation).
While Firewheels did claim that a Java implementation would be different than an
Objective C implementation, this is not necessarily owing to the fact that the
languages are different; it could be because the underlying implementations of
the languages are different. Just as one can have different implementations of
the same language, there can be different implementations of different
languages.
Finally, regardless what criteria is used to determine patent applicability, the
crux of Firewheels question remains: why should the criteria for determining
prior art be different than it is for determining infringement?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: cjk fossman on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 10:07 PM EDT |
What are your credentials?
How about just one link to support your interpretation of
"implemented?"
You see, I have *implemented* a few ideas in software, and I
do not agree with you.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 08:28 AM EDT |
Wouldn't your example give two different results?
Or am I missing the point?
-Section VIII[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 09:39 AM EDT |
| n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
