decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal. | 307 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 08:53 PM EDT
Yes they were. And not only PC:s.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal.
Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 09:30 PM EDT
Of course, he's using a different processor, so there's no prior art. ;-)


---
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is
advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal.
Authored by: Torinir on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 12:06 AM EDT
It would be a reasonable explanation for his desire to have the rest of the jury
skip discussions on prior art...

---
Gaming like it's going out of style.
West/Zampella vs Activision should be covered on Groklaw. :o

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal.
Authored by: newbury on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 01:31 PM EDT
For one, there is Mythtv. Isaac Richards started working on the Mythtv concept
in 2002 if not some aspects before that. In fact, 2002 may have been the date of
the public disclosure. The project has been expanded and enhanced continuously
since then.

No wonder the jury foreman does not want 'prior art' to have any significance.
His patent is actually worthless, invalid and should not have been issued.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Then the thing to do in this case...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:53 AM EDT
Is to show prior art and invalidate his bogus patent.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Lots around - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 08:53 AM EDT
One thing is for sure, this is going to be one fascinating appeal.
Authored by: Alan(UK) on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 01:59 PM EDT
BBC Domesday Project
This new multimedia edition of Domesday was compiled between 1984 and 1986 and published in 1986. It included a new "survey" of the United Kingdom, in which people, mostly school children, wrote about geography, history or social issues in their local area or just about their daily lives. Children from 9,000 schools were involved.[5] This was linked with maps, and many colour photos, statistical data, video and "virtual walks". Over 1 million people participated in the project. The project also incorporated professionally prepared video footage, virtual reality tours of major landmarks and other prepared datasets such as the 1981 census.

It ran of course on the BBC Microcomputer.

---
Microsoft is nailing up its own coffin from the inside.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )