Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Did the Jury decide willfullness and adjust numbers accordingly? | 307 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Did the Jury decide willfullness and adjust numbers accordingly?

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 04:27 PM EDT

No. The jury had the task of determining whether any infringement was willful.
And they did so.

The judge has the task of determining whether that willful infringement should
result in the tripled damages. The jury expressly stayed away from that.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Did the Jury decide willfullness and adjust numbers accordingly? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 05:16 PM EDT
- Did the Jury decide willfullness and adjust numbers accordingly? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 02:24 PM EDT

Did the Jury decide willfullness and adjust numbers accordingly?

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 04:18 PM EDT

They definitely made an error here, they should have levied 5 billion against
Samsung, with triple damages they could have wiped out Samsung's cash
reserves.

We would be free not only of a slavish copy cat, but also someone who negates
their own contract not to sue (with Intel and Qualcomm) against their legitimate

customers. Samsung deserves not to exist.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Florian, is that you? n/t - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 06 2012 @ 05:25 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )