Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

You must not have read footnote 1 | 129 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

You must not have read footnote 1

Authored by: nsomos on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 02:09 PM EDT

You must not have read footnote 1
-----------
1 In this motion, Interval’s amendments to its Supplemental Infringement
Contentions, and the accompanying exhibits, Interval will use the broad term “OS
X” to refer to both Apple’s OS X Mountain Lion operating system and to any
future, infringing revisions thereof.
-----------

They are not at all ...
"trying to suggest that OSX was originally released during 2012".

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

oh yes they are - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 02:50 PM EDT
- Hanlon's Razor - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 06:47 PM EDT
New Tactic: sue for future products - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 04:31 PM EDT
I forgot to add my own footnote to that post - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 05:03 AM EDT
I forgot to add my own footnote to that post - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 05 2012 @ 05:04 AM EDT

"OS X Was Not Publicly Available at the Time of Interval’s Infringement Contentions"

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT

If you go online to the AppStore, or in special circumstance where
you can't download, go to a retail Apple Store, and ask to purchase
MacOS X, you will be sold Version 10.8.1 also known as Mountain Lion.
Previous versions are obsolete, altho' still supported by security updates.

Version 10.8 containing the alleged infringing features common to iOS
was not available before 25 July 2012.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"OS X Was Not Publicly Available at the Time of Interval’s Infringement Contentions" - Authored by: al_dunsmuir on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 05:23 PM EDT
- No. Not Wrong. But I'll avoid Bold Caps. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 04 2012 @ 06:42 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )