|
| Authored by: SilverWave on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 01:26 PM EDT |
Qoute: If law experts don’t know if it was infringing, then who does?
Twelve random people who showed up at the courthouse, apparently.
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: SilverWave on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 01:27 PM EDT |
Quote: Wasn’t it all about rounded rectangles?
Oh, heavens no, that would be silly. The rounded rectangle form was actually the
one patent that the jury did not find Samsung guilty of infringing. The company
was instead found guilty of copying such unfathomably original ideas as
edge-to-edge glass, having icons arranged into a grid, and the color black.
---
:-)
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: symbolset on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 02:39 PM EDT |
| Thanks for the link [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 05:25 PM EDT |
What is the " legal standard for statutory jerkiness"?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
