|
|
|
| Authored by: BJ on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 04:54 PM EDT |
It was from my own first hand observation dating back five years ago and since.
On a side note: why is your first reflex always to defend the breed? Because
the alternative (by others) seems to be to always thoroughly ridicule and
lambast them?
Surely there must be a rational middle ground?
Yes, I'm cutting corners (pun intended!) but, no -- from my persepctive, a
lawyer, attorney what have you is too often a combination of designer clothes
and Apple iPhone -- both rather ostensible.
Talk about trade dress...!
bjd
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: tiger99 on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 06:29 PM EDT |
| With the honourable exceptions of at least one judge in the Oragoogle case, and
several lawyers such as Eben Moglen, not forgetting Mark. But in general, I
fear that you are totally correct, and that is why so much nonsense happens as a
result of rogue CEOs like Darl McBride and legal firms like BSF who are
technically clueless. It has to change. The legal system must somehow adapt to
be able to handle the challenges of the era of technology, or there will be many
insuperable problems coming. Governments have to become clued-up too. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 09:40 PM EDT |
The first step in addressing dysfunction in the patent system:
from the Newspick column,
'specially Steve Stites' first comment
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
