decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I think you are giving the public too much credit | 306 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not every customer is that dumb.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 01:30 AM EDT
Admittedly the average Apple fanboy's IQ can be counted on
one hand, but believe it or not, there are actually people
in the US who have a sufficiently high IQ to realise that
Apple didn't invent the rectangle, rounded corners, sliding
latch etc.

That is why customers in the US are rushing out in droves to
buy Samsung Galaxy S3s and Galaxy Notes, in case a US
government ban to force people in the US to buy iPhones
comes into place. People in the US do actually want and seek
out Samsung devices rather than iPhones.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I think you are giving the public too much credit
Authored by: knarf on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 02:23 AM EDT

Well, that depends on what twist the mainstream press will give to these chicaneries. Here in Europe there are already several articles in mainstream newspapers which decry the abuse of the patent system by companies like Apple. Another factor in bringing down Apple's image will be the final outcome of the court case in the UK, where they have been ordered to publicly state that Samsung did in fact not copy their precious. While this in itself might not leave that big a mark, it will pull the general public's attention towards these issues for a few moments.

The public is fickle, especially the fashion-conscious public which has been instrumental in giving Apple its meteoric rise to fame. If and when this public decides that it is no longer cool or 'normal' to associate with a brand, that brand will notice. Combine this with the more and more dated look and feel of iOS compared with both Android - which has no problems shedding its skin - and Windows Phone - which, whether you like it or not, *does* look 'different' - and suddenly those iThings don't look that appealing anymore.

Mom and dad's phone. Boring.

---
[ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Corporate Suicide?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 05:14 AM EDT
To my mind, the current Apple attitude smacks too much of SCO's outrageous
initial attacks. Businesses that go down the dog-in-the-manger road kill
themselves if they do not reform fast. Even a dedicated cult following cannot
save them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )