Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Doubt it | 306 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Doubt it

Authored by: jmc on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 08:27 AM EDT

Did the award of $1B to Apple apply to just alleged infringements in the US or
worldwide or is it vague?

If worldwide, then it could Samsung, having been ruled non-infringing in the UK,
go to back to the London High Court and claim that portion of the $1B which
applied to the UK? And likewise with all the other places they won in?

Could I suggest that GL publish some of the other Apple-v-Samsung decisions from
other jurisdictions? It's hard to believe that Samsung won't refer to them in
the appeal - and Apple won't refer to the US decisions in the other appeals.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Doubt it - Authored by: stegu on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 12:19 PM EDT
Better for them to sue in the UK - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 12:37 PM EDT
megaupload says differant - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 12:59 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )