decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You weren't aware the lightbulb already existed ... | 280 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You weren't aware the lightbulb already existed ...
Authored by: Tkilgore on Monday, September 03 2012 @ 02:42 PM EDT
Hi Wol,

That was part of my point a few levels up. Lots of people don't know that Edison
did not invent the light bulb. However, this general ignorance is due to the
many oversimplified narratives which got published, and to the fact that even
the little which was mentioned in some of those popularized accounts about
previous efforts to develop a light bulb got ignored and skimmed over by
successive generations of readers.

Edison was a complicated personality, very clever in some respects, very limited
in others, and not exactly always a saint. But let us give him credit when he
was honest. His patent application did not assert that he was the original
inventor of the light bulb. Much more modest than what is imagined in the
popular mind, the claim was for improvement of existing methods and materials.

Essentially, what Edison was claiming was that he had produced a light bulb
which was cheap enough and good enough for mass production and for selling on
the open market. Subsequent history does seem to indicate that his light bulb
was commercially feasible. It helped too, of course, that he was a good
businessman.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )