Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 01 2012 @ 04:40 PM EDT |
and they know it, which has them in the proverbial forked stick. Public
statements from Samsung say there is a "strong Chinese wall" between
the devices division involved in these lawsuits, and the components
division which supplies Apple with parts.
Apple meanwhile is taking insurance. The reputed mini iPad is alleged
to source its displays from two other sources,
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-31/apple-said-to-use-au-
optronics-lg-display-screens-in-mini-ipad.html
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 01 2012 @ 05:31 PM EDT |
I don't remember any design patents in Oracle v. Google. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, September 01 2012 @ 05:56 PM EDT |
If you noticed Google's statement about the
jury verdict in Apple v. Samsung, it mentioned
that several of the patents are under reexamination.
There were no design patents in Oracle v. Google.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|