decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Activist Juror | 280 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
or just maybe ...
Authored by: nsomos on Sunday, September 02 2012 @ 08:30 AM EDT
How about this guy is confidently but incorrectly
talking about 'source code', when what he looked
at and considered does not match what any suitably
trained engineer calls 'source code'.

I know what I consider more likely.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Activist Juror
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Sunday, September 02 2012 @ 12:51 PM EDT
IIRC, there was some source code in the exhibits. But, not sure why they would
be comparing sourcecode. Most likely any sourcecode they saw was mere snippets,
and I'd have a hard time believing they were supposed to bring any of that
evidence out of the courthouse. That stuff would certainly have been under seal.
Everytime this guy talks he digs himself deeper. Oh, the appeal record he is
building for Samsung.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )