Fair enough. You clearly know more about hardware development than I
do.
Michael, that is not, and never has been the point. The
subject of this branch of the conversation has been nothing more than a warning
about over-breadth generalization based on a false presumption of
knowledge.
'Been there, done that' can be good and sufficient counter to
'there does not exist ...' or 'it's not possible that ...'. All it takes is a
bit of understanding of our own individual weaknesses as well as confidence in
our actual strengths.
Over in the other branch of the conversation, I find
that PolR knows more than I know about discrete mathematics, and its relation
with software. Perhaps we can each learn something from PolR and each other,
and maybe we can teach a bit of what we do know in the
process. --- --Bill. NAL: question the answers, especially mine. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|