decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Please guide me - I'm obviously missing something | 484 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Please guide me - I'm obviously missing something
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 01:32 PM EDT
1. Now that you are addressing the claim, we seem to have come to some
agreement. The limitation to --electronic device is important.

2. When I said "claims", I was referring to the single claim in each
of plural patents, with the tablet design being an example.

3. When I said --you-- I was using the plural, as in you all, the majority of
posters here, the ones referring throughout this comments section to the
foreman's alleged erroneous reference to statements.

4. I know I gave my etch-a-sketch example before, but your post seemed to
ignore it and the position of your post in the hierarchy indicated you might not
have seen it.

I believe my last post addressed your other comments, though you seem to have
overlooked it. Since it troubles you when I repeat myself, I wont do it a
second time. However, if you made a point in your last post that I should have
addressed here, please let me know.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )