|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 30 2012 @ 01:32 PM EDT |
1. Now that you are addressing the claim, we seem to have come to some
agreement. The limitation to --electronic device is important.
2. When I said "claims", I was referring to the single claim in each
of plural patents, with the tablet design being an example.
3. When I said --you-- I was using the plural, as in you all, the majority of
posters here, the ones referring throughout this comments section to the
foreman's alleged erroneous reference to statements.
4. I know I gave my etch-a-sketch example before, but your post seemed to
ignore it and the position of your post in the hierarchy indicated you might not
have seen it.
I believe my last post addressed your other comments, though you seem to have
overlooked it. Since it troubles you when I repeat myself, I wont do it a
second time. However, if you made a point in your last post that I should have
addressed here, please let me know.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|