|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 09:54 AM EDT |
In a perfect world, they "shouldn't" though. That, I think, is what PJ
refers to since it opens up so many doors later.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 10:01 AM EDT |
As mentioned above I suspect they will want to win as long as there is no down
side. So, I wonder if there will be a backlash from consumers or suppliers?
Would Apple have considered this at all?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 10:06 AM EDT |
an attorney will take a win like this,
but what they want is a clear clean win with nothing to appeal.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 11:15 AM EDT |
Tim Cook isn't a lawyer. He wrote to the
employees that the trial was about values.
Assuming that is true, he should not want
to win by error.
And lawyers don't all feel that they should
win no matter how. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 02:29 PM EDT |
| n/c [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 03:28 PM EDT |
We could get a new, open source processor (a kickstarter project, possibly)
beyond the ken of any extant software patent.
Use some of the "walled-garden" tricks to disallow non-commons
patenting of any software created for it.
I don't think this will work, but if the verdict stands, it opens the
possibility. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 06:24 PM EDT |
No, they DON'T. This is the sort of "win" that brings Supreme Court
decisions of the variety that Apple DOES NOT WANT.
Don't kid yourself about what the Lawyers want. They want to litigate, yes.
Doing something "stupid" or allowing something "stupid" like
this to set a Precedent that very adversely affects the client is a BAD thing.
It costs you a client at the least and brings on malpractice suits on a periodic
basis.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
