|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 01:21 PM EDT |
hmmmmmm......but the old saying "what are they going to do,
take me out back and shoot me?" comes to mind.
She may not be worried or concerned one wit.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Exactly. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 05:39 PM EDT
|
|
| Authored by: DieterWasDriving on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 09:55 PM EDT |
Despite early proclamations to the press, Oracle vs. Google was worth
substantially less than $1B by the time the trial started.
This case was worth over $1B, yet was handled far worse. When a billion dollars
is at stake, far more deference should be given to allowing all reasonable
claims from the defense. Including extending the time for the defense when
appropriate rather than working from an absolute clock.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, August 29 2012 @ 12:17 AM EDT |
The jury won't be overturned, but the patent office has (afaik) no such
limitations on introducing the ten-ton block of prior art invalidating all of
the
patents involved, and if CAFC doesn't see it that way, there should be
enough interest that SCOTUS will.
(CHristenson)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
