decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. | 209 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case.
Authored by: Charles888 on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 03:02 AM EDT
Are you arguing that the functional patents withstand prior
arts? Pinch to zoom? Bounceback? Are you in tech at all?
NOT A CHANCE these patents should have been granted.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Should not need the 50b
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 11:05 AM EDT
Why should Samsung have to file this 50b if this is a wonderful Judge?

She should have at least allowed Samsung to demonstrate the F700 after Apple presented it to the jury. Instead we got some unfair advantage that clearly shows changes in cell phone technology that permitted the glass rectangle with rounded corners.
She should have blocked the Apple's attempt to sanction Samsung at the start instead of waiting until the end.

Really she was a poor Judge that favored the squeaky wheel and tried to cramp perhaps 4 different cases into a single short trial.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )