Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. | 209 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case.

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 10:51 PM EDT

besides your opinion, what makes the damages punitive? seems to me they
split the difference between the damages suggested by Apple's and Samsung's
experts.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 10:54 PM EDT
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 11:02 PM EDT
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 11:05 PM EDT
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 03:59 AM EDT
Don't you get tired of being hammered with the facts? - Authored by: cjk fossman on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 05:54 AM EDT
minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 12:43 PM EDT

minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case.

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 27 2012 @ 11:14 PM EDT

Judge Koh gave both parties a chance to dodge sending the issue to the jury. Indeed, uncertainty as to how a jury will respond to the evidence is a good reason to settle before going into court.

I know you have your disappointments with Judge Koh, but I like her. I think when Samsung makes their 50b motions regarding prior art, if the prior art evidence presented was solid and on point regarding the law, then the patents will be invalidated, the awards disappear, and the active products go back on market.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

minor mistakes? they didn't even give a verdict on the right case. - Authored by: Charles888 on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 03:02 AM EDT
Should not need the 50b - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 11:05 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )