Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Yes, according to the logic of the foreman | 209 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Does Samsung not infringe because it uses a different processor?

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 12:58 AM EDT

Forgot tio sign again.
Mouse the Lucky Dog ( woof ).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yes, according to the logic of the foreman

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 03:56 AM EDT

Interesting legal precedent he seems to be trying to set.

His thoughts on patent infringement are also groundbreaking
however, so I think we should wait for more wisdom before
drawing any conclusions.

Frankly the trial was so flawed anyway that a little bit of
creative behaviour by the jury is not the greatest of the
problems with the verdict.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Does Samsung not infringe because it uses a different processor?

Authored by: N_au on Tuesday, August 28 2012 @ 08:06 AM EDT

Not only different CPU but code for windows will not run on linux and vice
versa, so that should apply as well. So a patent that microsoft has shouldn't be
applied to Linux as infringing. If they followed this blokes reasoning there
would not be many patent court cases would there.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )